Very large scale desalination projects may be needed to meet the world’s future fresh water needs. There’s certainly enough seawater, but how much energy does it take?
|
|
| Desalination plant, Perth, Australia. | (ABC) |
In many areas, fresh water is getting used up faster than it’s being replenished, and demand for water is growing. We face a growing “water crisis” [1]. As we start running out of fresh water, there’s an obvious place to look for more. Just 2.5% of the Earth’s water is fresh water, the other 97.5% is saline [1]. Desalination could become a very large part of the world’s future water infrastructure. This raises several questions, but I’ll stick to just one of them here: How much energy is that going to take?
The Assumptions
How much desalination capacity will be installed world-wide? I don’t know, my crystal ball’s clouded up. What I’ll do is calculate two sets of numbers to try to bracket the possible options, a “low” scenario which may be a plausible outcome, and an extreme upper bound “maximum” scenario.
How many people will there be? The world population will most probably flatten out and peak at around 9.2 billion soon after 2050 [2]. I’ll take this as the maximum world population. How much water do we use? The highest per capita fresh water abstractions among OECD nations are those of the U.S., at 1730 m3 per capita per year, the lowest are Denmark’s at 130 m3 per capita per year [3]. I’ll use these two values to bracket the range.
How much energy does desalination require? The most efficient (reverse osmosis based) desalination plants consume about 5 kWh of energy per cubic metre of fresh water produced [4]. The fundamental thermodynamic limit for desalinating seawater is 0.86 kWh m−3 [4], so there’s plenty of room for improvement. I’ll use the 5 kWh m−3 figure for the “maximum” scenario, and assume a two-fold improvement for the “low” scenario. For the “maximum” scenario I’ll assume that all fresh water must come from desalination (i.e. that no other source of fresh water is available), for the “low” scenario I’ll adopt the more plausible assumption that 10% of the world’s fresh water will come from desalination.
The Energy Required for Large Scale Desalination
Table 1 summarises the two sets of assumptions, and the resulting calculations.
The “maximum” scenario takes the world population at its peak, assumes they all have U.S. levels of water consumption, and assumes that all that water comes from desalination. This is, of course, very unrealistic. It’s there to provide an upper bound to the set of possible outcomes. The “low” scenario goes for a more plausible possibility, with Denmark’s level of per capita water use, and 10% of the world’s water coming from desalination.
| Low scenario |
Maximum scenario |
Peak world population (circa 2050) [2] | 9.2 bn | 9.2 bn |
| Water consumption [3] (a) | (m3/capita/yr) | 130 | 1730 |
| Desalination energy [4] (b) | (kWh m−3) | 2.5 | 5.0 |
| Fraction of water from desalination | 10% | 100% | |
| Power for desalination (globally) | (GW) | 34 | 9100 |
| Additional price of water per capita (c) | (UKP/capita/yr) | £3.25 | £865 |
| Mean electricity generation in 2005 (for comparison) was 2100 GW. Notes: (a) The “low” value is water abstraction for Denmark; “maximum” value is water abstraction for U.S. (b) The units are kilowatt hours of electricity per cubic metre of fresh water. (c) Energy cost assumes an electricity price of £0.10 per kWh. |
|||
The “low” scenario uses 34 GW of electrical power worldwide, to provide 10% of the world’s water needs by desalination. For comparison, global electricity generation in 2005 averaged 2100 GW [5]. That is, the entire world population can have 10% of its water needs met by desalination with less than 2% of the world’s present day electrical energy. The “maximum” scenario requires over four times the world’s electrical power generation, but this is an extreme upper bound.
How much would that cost? For the “low” scenario and an electricity cost of £0.10 per kWh, the cost of the energy for desalinated water is £3.25 per person per year. For the “maximum” scenario, it’s £865. The cost of desalination is sometimes described as “prohibitively expensive”. The need for water is absolute; if there’s no cheaper alternative, the word “prohibitive” isn’t particularly accurate.
Conclusions
I’ll cover the caveats first. Large scale desalination would require extensive infrastructure changes, such as aqueducts from coastal areas leading inland, and so on. I haven’t considered any of that here, I’ve just focussed on a single fundamental question, the energy requirement of this arrangement.
The energy requirement is large, but well within the range of existing energy infrastructure. The price is high, but in the same ballpark as existing utility costs. There are no fundamental showstoppers to desalination on a massive scale. Very large scale desalination is a viable way to extend fresh water resources. There’s a phrase about “eating oil” to describe agricultural fertilizer use. We may end up “drinking energy”.
References
- The Global Water Crisis, Encyclopedia of Desalination and Water Resources (DESWARE), UNESCO Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)
- World Population Prospects, The 2006 Revision Population Database, United Nations Population Division (2007)
- Water Consumption, OECD Factbook (2005) (WebCite cache)
- Energy Requirements Of Desalination Processes, Encyclopedia of Desalination and Water Resources (DESWARE), UNESCO Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS)
- Key World Energy Statistics, International Energy Agency (2007), (page 26) (WebCite cache)



4 responses so far ↓
Frank Passarelli // April 4, 2008 at 4:58 pm
Several news articles on seawater desalination reveal
that desalination technology is little understood by
most journalists, local water managers, politicians
and environmental groups. In searching for
renewable potable water or supplementing current
sources few are aware that there is more than one
desalination technology.
When evaluating a desalination project Reverse Osmosis
is typically the process considered. Yet, there is a
viable and proven alternative in distillation. The
Advanced Vapor Compression Desalination
Process is an advanced and highly environmentally
friendly desalination process, an alternative, single
performance, and lower maintenance process compared to
Reverse Osmosis. The system is based on proven
flash distilling principles but features an innovative,
highly efficient, and compact design. Additionally,
it offers a unique advantage in the treatment of salt byproducts.
The system produces outputs of either valuable crystalline
Salt or concentrated brine. The process is optimized for
the desalination of seawater drawn from wells below the
sea floor and not returning the brine to the sea.
The process has modular abilities and can be expanded
to meet future requirements in water demand or
designed and built at the start for higher volume. A
basic plant design can operate on solar, thermal,
nuclear or traditional energy sources. Each unit is
optimized from an initial engineering site study to
account for different environmental and structural
needs. A basic stand-alone unit of 1 acre-foot per day
has a footprint of approximately thirty feet in
diameter. The larger the plant water volume the lower
the cost is per acre-foot. The plant energy
consumption is on the order of about 4 to 21 kw per
1000 gallons produced based on the design, volume
produced and type of energy.
The system can also be used in industrial treatment
and recovery of effluent water. The life cycle of the
plant is based on a 25 year time line which can be
extended through proper preventable maintenance and overhaul.
Charlie Madden // November 23, 2008 at 1:28 pm
8 people out of 10 live within 30 km of the sea – & its sea breezes. Use the wind to drive thermal desal units & pumps to pump the fesh water in land.
H2AU // July 2, 2009 at 7:35 am
Excellent post, great understanding of desalination and the challenges ahead. In recent years, seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) desalination technology has moved forward in leaps and bounds, and continues to do so.
One minor point to note is the energy numbers – your source of 5 kWh/m3 is from the IAEA in 1992. Today, this would be considered a very conservative number. Using energy recovery technology such as the PX (Pressure Exchanger) from ERI (www.energyrecovery.com), the SWRO process can consume under 2.2 kWh/m3. A 2008 study by the National Academy of Sciences (www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12184) puts the number at between 3.4 – 4.5 kWh/m3.
Obviously, these numbers are the specific energy for the membrane separation process – feed and reticulation pumping not included – but perhaps it is fair to consider that even traditional dams and groundwater sources require varying amounts of source and distribution pumping.
Desalination is absolutely one part of the solution, and will continue to improve in energy efficiency with the huge amount of research currently underway (for example, carbon nanotubes). Naturally however, a diversified water supply is always the ideal approach – consisting of dams, groundwater, BRWO and SWRO, thermal co-generation and water recycling amongst other technologies.
lightbucket // July 2, 2009 at 10:03 am
Hi H2AU,
Yes, I used the 5 kWh/m3 figure as a very conservative estimate. As you say, significantly lower energy use has been achieved.