<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PR versus science: the Luntz memo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lightbucket.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/pr-versus-science-the-luntz-memo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lightbucket.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/pr-versus-science-the-luntz-memo/</link>
	<description>a science blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:29:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Language change, alternatives and spin &#124; thedanglingmodifier.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://lightbucket.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/pr-versus-science-the-luntz-memo/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>Language change, alternatives and spin &#124; thedanglingmodifier.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 09:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightbucket.wordpress.com/?p=129#comment-520</guid>
		<description>[...] Lightbucket, who even has a picture of the memo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lightbucket, who even has a picture of the memo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green Journalism&#187; Think of a number&#8230; 350?</title>
		<link>http://lightbucket.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/pr-versus-science-the-luntz-memo/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>Green Journalism&#187; Think of a number&#8230; 350?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightbucket.wordpress.com/?p=129#comment-360</guid>
		<description>[...] has played a large role in the narrative of climate change to date. There is of course the famous Luntz memo for Republican party/Bush administration tactics on refusing to let the &#8216;certainty&#8217; of the science be settled. Putting aside, of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has played a large role in the narrative of climate change to date. There is of course the famous Luntz memo for Republican party/Bush administration tactics on refusing to let the &#8216;certainty&#8217; of the science be settled. Putting aside, of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Current Climate &#187; Think of a number: 350?</title>
		<link>http://lightbucket.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/pr-versus-science-the-luntz-memo/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>The Current Climate &#187; Think of a number: 350?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightbucket.wordpress.com/?p=129#comment-292</guid>
		<description>[...] has played a large role in the narrative of climate change to date. There is of course the famous Luntz memo for Republican party/Bush administration tactics on refusing to let the &#8216;certainty&#8217; of the science be settled. Putting aside, of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has played a large role in the narrative of climate change to date. There is of course the famous Luntz memo for Republican party/Bush administration tactics on refusing to let the &#8216;certainty&#8217; of the science be settled. Putting aside, of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
